MUNICH (AP) — NATO's
secretary-general said Saturday the alliance has no intention of
backing down on its plans for a European-missile defense system despite
ongoing criticism from Russia.
Anders Fogh Rasmussen told a small group of reporters on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference that in dealings with Moscow "this question of missile defense
remains ... the big elephant in the room." But he said NATO's decision
has been made and he hopes Russia will work together with the alliance
on the issue.
"We have made clear from the outset that NATO has made the decision to establish a NATO missile defense system because it's our obligation to ensure effective defense of our populations," Fogh Rasmussen said. "Having said that, we have invited Russia to cooperate and ... now it's up to Russia to engage in that."
The comments came after Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov
told the gathering of top diplomats and defense officials that NATO's
missile defense program and eastward expansion have caused undue
friction reminiscent of the Cold War.
"Officially we have abandoned the mindset of the Cold War — Russia
and NATO countries say that they do not see each other as adversaries
... but we should admit that we should still come a long way to match
our words with deeds," Lavrov said.
The U.S. and NATO say the missile defense plan is aimed at fending
off an Iranian missile threat, but Moscow has rejected the claim, saying
the system may eventually grow powerful enough to threaten Russia's
nuclear deterrent.
Fogh Rasmussen flatly rejected the criticism, saying: "I clearly denounce these allegations."
"There is a clear link between what we say and what we do," he said.
During the conference, Fogh Rasmussen urged cash-strapped European nations not to use the alliance's drawdown of forces in Afghanistan as an excuse to cut defense spending.
"We must build on what we have gained in operations such as
Afghanistan, not cash in on what some may perceive as the post-ISAF
dividend," he said.
"In this age of austerity, that looks like an attractive option, but
it would be the wrong option. Because security challenges won't wait
while we fix our finances and more cuts now will lead to greater
insecurity in the future, at a cost we simply can't afford. We saw this
after the Cold War, when we were ill prepared to respond to the crises
in the Balkans."
He noted that since 2001, the U.S. share of NATO defense spending has
risen from 63 percent to 72 percent while most European nations have
cut their defense budgets.
Fogh Rasmussen said that, instead of cuts, NATO countries should use
funds saved from the Afghanistan drawdown to invest in capabilities
where it has found itself lacking.
"We have learned lessons from our operations in Afghanistan as well
as Libya and Mali," where the alliance isn't operating but some of its
members are. "What we see is that ... such operations couldn't be
carried out successfully without a significant American contribution,"
he said.
"It is necessary for Europe to
invest more in long-distance airlift capacity, in air-to-air refueling
as we learned in Libya, in intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance
capabilities — in all these areas."
No comments:
Post a Comment